This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rfa/doc] correct info about best C++ compilers/debug formats


The only testing I did was to build gdb (hey, it takes only 10 minutes)
and then look at the 'makeinfo' output in the log file.  I didn't even
read the generated info files, let alone chase references.

> As long as we are testing, perhaps someone could find a moment and TeX 
> the manual, to see that the additions typeset well.

This falls in my self-claimed charter of "gdb quality assurance".

I've added this to my todo list.

Can you give me a brain dump of how to QA the manuals: what software
I need to have, what procedures to follow, how to check the output,
things that often go wrong.

Michael C


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]