This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa/doc] correct info about best C++ compilers/debug formats
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- To: eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il
- Cc: carlton at math dot stanford dot edu, drow at mvista dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:24:24 -0600
- Subject: Re: [rfa/doc] correct info about best C++ compilers/debug formats
The only testing I did was to build gdb (hey, it takes only 10 minutes)
and then look at the 'makeinfo' output in the log file. I didn't even
read the generated info files, let alone chase references.
> As long as we are testing, perhaps someone could find a moment and TeX
> the manual, to see that the additions typeset well.
This falls in my self-claimed charter of "gdb quality assurance".
I've added this to my todo list.
Can you give me a brain dump of how to QA the manuals: what software
I need to have, what procedures to follow, how to check the output,
things that often go wrong.
Michael C