This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] KFAIL gdb/1025
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:16:57AM -0800, David Carlton wrote:
> * I'm using the binutils that comes with Red Hat 7.3; rpm -q reports
> it as binutils-2.11.93.0.2-11. So it's old. I'll upgrade that and
> see what happens. (And then do what to the test? Turn it from
> KFAIL into XFAIL, I suppose?)
That depends on the nature of the failure. It might still be a KFAIL.
> * I gave the wrong GDB version: I was using CVS GDB from yesterday. I
> saw the FAILs using 'make check' on yesterday's CVS, but then I
> investigated it using whatever GDB happened to be in /usr/local/bin
> (which, if you're curious, is the current dictionary branch GDB, and
> I haven't sync'd with mainline since whatever old date I listed). I
> try to remember to use CVS GDB when investigating bugs, so I get the
> date entered right, but sometimes I forget.
>
> And I have some other questions/comments:
>
> * If it's all due to binutils, why do Michael's tables still show some
> non-PASS results with GCC 2.95.3/DWARF-2?
>
> * It's not the same as PR 872. That's about overload resolution; this
> bug doesn't seem to be related to overload resolution.
Oh, blah, my apologies. overload.exp has tests with almost the same
names. If you could send me a compiled binary which does show the
problem I'd appreciate that. Attach it to the PR maybe.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer