This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] KFAIL gdb/1025


Weird, my notes say that gcc 3.0.4 had this problem but that
gcc 3.1 and later did not.  But I am definitely not seeing any
'description field too big' messages with my test bed,
and that includes gcc 3.2.1, gcc 3.2.2-20030203, and gcc-3_2-branch,
with binutils 2.13.2.1 and -gstabs+.

Aha.  My test bed runs with:

  runtest ... --target-board unix/gdb:debug_flags=-gstabs+

But the gcj command is not getting invoked with -gstabs+.  So I am
always testing gcj with the default debug format, which explains
my results.

Argh.  Yet another dejagnu mystery to look into.  David, how do you
run the test suite?

Michael C


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]