This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA/RFC] thread local storage tests
- From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- Cc: ezannoni at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:54:50 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] thread local storage tests
- References: <200302080541.h185fm427022@duracef.shout.net>
Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes:
> Elena Z writes:
>
> > What glibc(s) were you using? It may also be due to slightly versions
> > of binutils, even though, you are also using HEAD binutils, and it
> > should work there.
>
> glibc 2.2.93-5-rh, the vendor libc that comes with red hat linux 8.0.
>
> My tables say: 'osversion=red-hat-8.0' and 'libc=vendor'.
>
I think a more recent glibc is needed. :-( let me find out more.
> > Do you have the gdb.logs for the cases that almost work?
>
> Errr, I already moved them to /dev/null. Damn. But I can re-generate
> them easily.
>
> ftp://ftp.shout.net/pub/users/mec/gdb/2003-02-07a-tls.tar.gz
>
> The '7a' is because it's a different run than the tables that
> I published.
>
> Everything is in there. There is one directory for each configuration
> tested, with a 'gdb-test-run.xml', 'gdb.sum', 'gdb.log', and
> 'test.tar.gz'. That last file is a tarball of the actual 'test'
> directory which has the juicy executables.
>
thanks, I'll take a look this evening.
elena
> Michael C