This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
There is a patch that was submitted on Oct 30th 2002 but hasn't been reviewed despite the fact that it addresses a GDB crash. It also expands break.exp to test for this.Second ping...On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:00:58PM -0500, Klee Dienes wrote:> A safer change for 5.3 might be the patch I submitted on October 30th.
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-10/msg00586.html
> > Rather than deal with sharing the command-line structure, I just > updated bpstat_copy to match its comment, and do a deep copy of the > command lines as well as the value. I don't really have a strong > opinion about copying the command lines vs. managing them the way Joel > proposes, although my patch does have the argument of simplicity going > for it. On the other hand, if/when we go to a more sophistiated > command-line evaluator, we'll probably want the command body to be some > opaque and externally managed structure anyway.
> > Whichever patch we end up taking, though, we should be sure to update > the comment in bpstat_copy and add my proposed change to the test suite.
Thanks,
-- Joel
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |