This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: patch to add QNX NTO i386 support
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 11:19:28PM +0100, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> >>Oh! I was misunderstanding - I've never seen that particular syntax
> >>for run before, and if you ask me, it should be killed ASAP. It's
> >>terribly confusing to ambiguously use the first argument as a program.
> >>
> >>Let me guess, it's the documented way to use GDB with target qnx?
> >
> >
> >Bingo. And it's also the way our ide talks to gdb. If the exec filename
> >is
> >not set, gdb treats the first argument to run as the path to the file and
> >subsequent arguments as regular args.
>
> I don't think that change would be accepted into GDB. It makes `run'
> just too modal :-/
That was my first reaction too. But he's not describing a local change
to GDB - we already do this! Argh!
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer