This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Merge gdbarch.sh and doc/gdbint.texinfo?
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- To: Zaretskii Eli <ezaretski at elta dot co dot il>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 08:06:02 -0500
- Subject: Re: Merge gdbarch.sh and doc/gdbint.texinfo?
- References: <4D19136444628A40840EFE8C5AE04147017A33@ELTIMAIL1.elta.co.il>
(yes I probably should have sent this to gdb@)
From: Andrew Cagney [mailto:ac131313 at redhat dot com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 11:45 PM
What do people think of moving gdbarch.sh's table of methods into
gdbinit.texinfo and have gdbarch.sh extract them from there?
I'm all for it.
There is an `obvious' follow on to this. The target, along with some
other vectors, could also be put into separate appendicies.
As a kind of related side effect, what do people think of making the architecture vector table an appendix. That way it doesn't clutter up the core internals documentation.
What about this? My guess at what to do next is:
- move the arch vector to the appendix and make it a separate file
- change it to use that weird @defun texi thingie
- add in the missing methods
- finally start worrying about the doco
Andrew