On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 12:51:18PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>When you first committed that stuff, I warned you that would happen :-)
>>The above test handled differently.
>
>
>Hey, you can't blame me for this bit. I didn't add that check for
>DEPRECATED_PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY, it was already there in
>generic_frame_chain_valid.
I'm refering to frame_chain_valid(), a small part of which you changed.
The useful bits (your changes) were copied to the rewritten
get_prev_frame. When frame_chain_valid() is deleted, that duplication
will go away. To see what's wrong with frame_chain_valid() see
legacy_get_prev_frame.
I'm slow. Could you explain the problem? There's a comment about
things being deduced there which is no longer true, and a comment about
leaves of main that I can't make heads nor tails of but I don't think
it applies.