This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Zaretskii Eli" <ezaretski at elta dot co dot il> To: "Elena Zannoni" <ezannoni at redhat dot com>; "Raoul Gough" <RaoulGough at yahoo dot co dot uk> Cc: <gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 7:08 AM Subject: RE: [RFA] DLLs without debugging symbols (repost) > > From: Elena Zannoni [mailto:ezannoni at redhat dot com] > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:00 AM > > > > The texinfo stuff should be approved by Eli. Mybe post it as a > > separate [RFA/doco] message, it will be more likely to be noticed. > > Sorry, I did miss the original message. > > The doco patch is approved, but please put "kernel32.dll" inside @file. Done (new diff attached). > > Also, please use "---" (three dashes in a row) instead of just "-" when > you want an em-dash in the manual. Also done (assuming an em-dash is one of them free-standing ones, rather than one in a compound word). > > Symbol names such as ``KERNEL32!CreateFileA'' should be in @code (and > without the quotes). Done. > > Instead of "(see @ref{Symbols})", please use "(@pxref{Symbols})". Done. > > Finally, I suggest some @cindex entry about symbol names in non-debug > DLLs somewhere in the text. Users might look for this information in > the index. You might have missed the one I already had ("DLLs with no debugging symbols") but I've added another one for good (?) measure - "Minimal symbols and DLLs" > > Thanks! Thank you! Regards, Raoul Gough.
Attachment:
gdb.texinfo.diff.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |