This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rfa] new test, pr-1090.exp, multi-register variables


On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 02:29:29AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Just FYI,
> 
> >To my mind, these are critical bugs, because gdb quietly prints the
> >wrong information.  If we can't fix it for 5.4/6.0 then I want to
> >add gdb/214 and gdb/1090 to the PROBLEMS file.
> 
> The only critical thing in GDB 5.4/6.0 is ensuring that the new EMACS 
> mode has everything it needs without relying on level two annotiations. 
>  And that has a very hard deadline :-(

I beg to differ.  Why should Emacs dictate our schedule?  Why shouldn't
critical debugging issues?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]