This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa] new test, pr-1090.exp, multi-register variables
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>, fnasser at redhat dot com,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 09:21:46 -0500
- Subject: Re: [rfa] new test, pr-1090.exp, multi-register variables
- References: <200302240435.h1O4ZVb07087@duracef.shout.net> <3E59C9D9.3040906@redhat.com>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 02:29:29AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Just FYI,
>
> >To my mind, these are critical bugs, because gdb quietly prints the
> >wrong information. If we can't fix it for 5.4/6.0 then I want to
> >add gdb/214 and gdb/1090 to the PROBLEMS file.
>
> The only critical thing in GDB 5.4/6.0 is ensuring that the new EMACS
> mode has everything it needs without relying on level two annotiations.
> And that has a very hard deadline :-(
I beg to differ. Why should Emacs dictate our schedule? Why shouldn't
critical debugging issues?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer