This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: sh-elf disassembly broken (Was: Re: RFC: Moving disassembler_command to cli land and using newer disassembler code)
- From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>
- To: Joern Rennecke <joern dot rennecke at superh dot com>
- Cc: Fernando Nasser <fnasser at redhat dot com>, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 16:53:19 -0500
- Subject: Re: sh-elf disassembly broken (Was: Re: RFC: Moving disassembler_command to cli land and using newer disassembler code)
- References: <3E231F8E.72AA3D4A@superh.com><3E5A7F58.8C87B17D@superh.com>
Joern, would something like this work, instead?
Index: sh-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/uberbaum/gdb/sh-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -p -r1.96 sh-tdep.c
--- sh-tdep.c 3 Feb 2003 14:38:05 -0000 1.96
+++ sh-tdep.c 24 Feb 2003 21:48:59 -0000
@@ -937,6 +937,7 @@ sh_store_struct_return (CORE_ADDR addr,
static int
gdb_print_insn_sh (bfd_vma memaddr, disassemble_info *info)
{
+ info->mach = gdbarch_bfd_arch_info (current_gdbarch)->mach;
info->endian = TARGET_BYTE_ORDER;
return print_insn_sh (memaddr, info);
}
Joern Rennecke writes:
> I wrote:
> >
> > This patch:
> >
> > 2002-11-07 Fernando Nasser <fnasser at redhat dot com>
> >
> > * printcmd.c (disassemble_command): Remove obsolete function.
> > (_initialize_printcmd): Do not create disassemble command here.
> > * cli/cli-cmds.c (disassemble_command): New function. Implements
> > disassemble command.
> > (init_cli_cmds): Create disassemble command here instead.
> >
> > breaks disassembly for sh-elf (just try to disassemble any
> > function in any sh-elf object file).
> >
> > gdb_disassembly uses TARGET_PRINT_INSN_INFO->mach to initialize
> > di.mach, but TARGET_PRINT_INSN_INFO->mach is never initialized.
> >
> > Before your patch, print_insn had set TARGET_PRINT_INSN_INFO->mach
> > to TARGET_ARCHITECTURE->mach, which gets expanded to
> > (gdbarch_bfd_arch_info (current_gdbarch))->mach .
>
> And didn't get any reply.
>
> So I had a go at writing a conservative patch, which handles the mach
> field likee tui/tuiDisassem.c:tui_disassemble .
>
> Although I have the feeling that TARGET_PRINT_INSN_INFO should be really
> a local variable of print_insn, and if any information might be missing
> in the gdbarch struct to initialize TARGET_PRINT_INSN_INFO and asm_info
> in tui/tuiDisassem.c:tui_disassemble , that should rather be added to
> the gdbarch struct.
>
> --
> --------------------------
> SuperH (UK) Ltd.
> 2410 Aztec West / Almondsbury / BRISTOL / BS32 4QX
> T:+44 1454 465658Mon Feb 24 19:59:50 2003 J"orn Rennecke <joern dot rennecke at superh dot com>
>
> * disasm.c (gdb_disassembly): If TARGET_ARCHITECTURE is non-zero,
> initialize di.mach from there.
>
> Index: disasm.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/disasm.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -p -r1.4 disasm.c
> *** disasm.c 3 Feb 2003 01:18:37 -0000 1.4
> --- disasm.c 24 Feb 2003 19:59:47 -0000
> *************** gdb_disassembly (struct ui_out *uiout,
> *** 338,344 ****
> --- 338,350 ----
> di_initialized = 1;
> }
>
> + /* ??? TARGET_PRINT_INSN_INFO is undocumented and only initialized inside
> + printcmd.c:print_insn , and some strange hacks that access fields of
> + the variable that underlies the implementation of this macro. */
> di.mach = TARGET_PRINT_INSN_INFO->mach;
> + if (TARGET_ARCHITECTURE != NULL)
> + di.mach = TARGET_ARCHITECTURE->mach;
> +
> if (TARGET_BYTE_ORDER == BFD_ENDIAN_BIG)
> di.endian = BFD_ENDIAN_BIG;
> else