--- Begin Message ---
- From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:48:48 +1030
- Subject: Re: [rfa] `struct _bfd' -> `struct bfd'
- References: <3E59C04D.3040304@redhat.com> <20030227011752.GZ31111@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <3E5D747D.5000302@redhat.com>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 09:14:21PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:48:45AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> >> (_bfd): Define for backward compatibility.
> >
> >
> >Do we really need this? Seems like you can update gdb and sim in
> >tandem with the rest of your change. Other users of bfd will just
> >need a small and fairly obvious change if they happen to use
> >struct _bfd, _and_ want to use a new libbfd.
>
> Well, for a day or so. It will make the switch easier.
OK, go ahead. I'll delete it tomorrow. :-)
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre
--- End Message ---