This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA]: File-I/O patch, Documentation
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:33:08AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > c99 (what ever the standard) formalized a number of explicitly sized
> > types (int32 et.al. I believe). I think this table should be specified
> > using those types. The alternative is to generalize the
> > sim/common/sim-types.h file and then specify the sizes using that.
>
> I don't think so. The protocol is more or less self-contained. All
> definitions are based on the assumption, that you'll never find a
> really matching combination of values as they are defined on all
> machines. Looking into the fileio code you'll see, that gdb has a
> couple of functions which transform all protocol datatypes to host
> datatypes and all protocol values to host values and vice versa.
> This is done that way to be totally independent from other sources of
> definition (especially machine dependent definitions).
>
> It's *expected* that the gdb plugin on the target side is doing the
> same.
Sure. But how big are they on the wire? I think that's what Andrew
was asking to be clarified.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer