This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC/RFA] GDB crash when using command lines due to memory corruption
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Klee Dienes <klee at apple dot com>
- Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at gnat dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 18:38:14 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] GDB crash when using command lines due to memory corruption
- References: <20021211173805.GG25575@gnat.com> <8096FEF2-0D32-11D7-9BDD-00039396EEB8@apple.com>
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:00:58PM -0500, Klee Dienes wrote:
> A safer change for 5.3 might be the patch I submitted on October 30th.
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-10/msg00586.html
>
> Rather than deal with sharing the command-line structure, I just
> updated bpstat_copy to match its comment, and do a deep copy of the
> command lines as well as the value. I don't really have a strong
> opinion about copying the command lines vs. managing them the way Joel
> proposes, although my patch does have the argument of simplicity going
> for it. On the other hand, if/when we go to a more sophistiated
> command-line evaluator, we'll probably want the command body to be some
> opaque and externally managed structure anyway.
>
> Whichever patch we end up taking, though, we should be sure to update
> the comment in bpstat_copy and add my proposed change to the test suite.
Klee, I'm going to approve the breakpoint parts of this patch now.
Since this bug really annoyed me, I'm checking them in, too. Would you
mind reposting the testsuite patch for approval?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer