Re: [RFA/testsuite] test hand function call in commands list

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>]

On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 07:09:05PM -0400, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > No; let's figure out what the new problem is first.  After that let's
> > get the test in as quickly as possible so that we know if it breaks
> > again :)
> 
> Sure.
> 
> > I can reproduce this.  It's even simpler; we aren't executing the
> > commands list even if if there's no inferior function call in them. 
> > This appears to be specific to commands on a breakpoint hit during an
> > inferior function call.
> 
> This is really bizarre. I do remember very clearly that removing the
> "silent" command in the commands list caused the breakpoint number to
> be printed. So it seemed that the commands where executed...

Silent is handled separately from the rest of the commands list; it's
handled when the breakpoint is hit, but the commands themselves run
later.

> > Did this ever work?
> 
> Since Klee posted the patch, I was assuming that he had it working at
> some point.

I don't know if it was tested in the FSF tree.  Although yes is
probably a safe bet...

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer