This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] varobj: call CHECK_TYPEDEF


On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 03:29:36PM -0700, Keith Seitz wrote:

On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 15:18, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> BTW, does ...
> > struct t
> {
> int a;
> int b;
> };
> > typedef struct t T;
> > main()
> {
> static T v = {...};
> }
> > tickle it?


Nope, that works properly (except for it being reported as "struct t" instead of "T").


[Keith, you had "test for insight/792" in your posted testsuite patch.]

There's at least one compiler bug in this area, where DWARF-2 debug info
will say struct t instead of T.  I fixed it for 3.3 and (I think?)
3.2.3.  Just in case you start getting confused :)

So, rather than `bug', `probable gcc bug'?


Andrew



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]