This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Make sure gdb-cfg.texi is created

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
Cc: hjl at lucon dot org, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 17:39:04 +0200
Subject: Re: PATCH: Make sure gdb-cfg.texi is created
References: <20030509122434.A5769@lucon.org><2593-Sat10May2003124532+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>

"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@elta.co.il> writes:

|> > Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 12:24:34 -0700
|> > From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
|> > 
|> > +	  ln -s ${srcdir}/${DOC_CONFIG}-cfg.texi gdb-cfg.texi && \
|> > +	  test -e gdb-cfg.texi) || \
|> 
|> Is the `-e' option a standard option of `test' in the shell, or is it
|> some kind of extension?  I don't think we should use it unless it is
|> standard.

`test -e' is POSIX, but not supported by some older shells (according to
the autoconf docs Solaris 2.5 does not have it).

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: Make sure gdb-cfg.texi is created
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

References:
- PATCH: Make sure gdb-cfg.texi is created
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Make sure gdb-cfg.texi is created
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]