This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [rfa] struct dictionary

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:20:51 -0700
Subject: Re: [rfa] struct dictionary
References: <ro1k7dbwprh.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU> <16101.3585.739945.993550@localhost.redhat.com> <ro1n0gp6fyf.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU> <16102.9919.32103.991732@localhost.redhat.com> <ro1wuft4vns.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>

On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:47:19AM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
> That makes sense: an enum it is, then.  (And in a year or two, we can
> switch GDB over to C++, and have an actual boolean type, but never
> mind that.)

<stdbool.h>? 

Gcc has supported it for a long time (2.95, at least).  It's
got the C99 _Bool type.

r~

References:
- Re: [rfa] struct dictionary
  - From: Elena Zannoni
- Re: [rfa] struct dictionary
  - From: David Carlton
- Re: [rfa] struct dictionary
  - From: Elena Zannoni
- Re: [rfa] struct dictionary
  - From: David Carlton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]