This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch/testsuite] gdb.c++/classes.exp: add another ptypepattern

From: David Carlton <carlton at kealia dot com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>,Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 12:19:52 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch/testsuite] gdb.c++/classes.exp: add another ptypepattern
References: <200307021649.h62GnKLW026005@duracef.shout.net><yf2of0cg8ly.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com><20030702183257.GA8828@nevyn.them.org><1030702190233.ZM2148@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 12:02:33 -0700, Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> said:

> See

>     http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-05/msg01715.html

> (where I explain the motivation behind this change).

Ah, thanks.  That seems like a reasonable change, then.

Does this give fully-qualified names for types defined in namespaces,
too?  I don't have GCC 3.3 lying around and I'm not familiar enough
with GCC to be able to tell from the patch.

David Carlton
carlton@kealia.com

References:
- Re: [patch/testsuite] gdb.c++/classes.exp: add another ptype pattern
  - From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: [patch/testsuite] gdb.c++/classes.exp: add another ptypepattern
  - From: David Carlton
- Re: [patch/testsuite] gdb.c++/classes.exp: add another ptype pattern
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [patch/testsuite] gdb.c++/classes.exp: add another ptype pattern
  - From: Kevin Buettner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]