This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [top level] autoconfiscate INSTALL usage
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 10:59:24 -0700
- Subject: Re: [top level] autoconfiscate INSTALL usage
- References: <20030712175800.GA898@doctormoo>
Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> writes:
> Zack said:
>>I've been wondering for years why GCC 'make install' never used the
>>perfectly good /usr/bin/install on Linux or Solaris.
>>
>>> +INSTALL_DATA = @INSTALL_DATA
>>
>>Typo - need a trailing @.
> Thanks for catching that. (Gah; I thought I'd looked at the resulting
> Makefile and it was OK... I guess I saw what I expected to see.) OK
> with that fix?
I can't approve toplevel patches, but it looks good to me.
>>Do similar patches need to be put into the subdirectory Makefiles, or
>>do they just take the values of INSTALL_* passed down from the top
>>level?
> I think generally they just take the passed-down copies.
Would you mind checking that?
zw