This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
[obvious] typo in remote-sim.c
- From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:22:08 -0700
- Subject: [obvious] typo in remote-sim.c
- Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
2003-07-17 Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
* remote-sim.c: Comment typo fix.
Index: remote-sim.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/remote-sim.c,v
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -p -r1.30 remote-sim.c
*** remote-sim.c 8 May 2003 22:33:14 -0000 1.30
--- remote-sim.c 18 Jul 2003 00:19:18 -0000
*************** gdbsim_fetch_register (int regno)
*** 331,337 ****
warn_user = 0;
}
/* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-27: Should check `nr_bytes == 0'
! indicatingthat GDB and the SIM have different ideas about
which registers are fetchable. */
/* Else if (nr_bytes < 0): an old simulator, that doesn't
think to return the register size. Just assume all is ok. */
--- 331,337 ----
warn_user = 0;
}
/* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-27: Should check `nr_bytes == 0'
! indicating that GDB and the SIM have different ideas about
which registers are fetchable. */
/* Else if (nr_bytes < 0): an old simulator, that doesn't
think to return the register size. Just assume all is ok. */
*************** gdbsim_store_register (int regno)
*** 369,375 ****
internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
"Register size different to expected");
/* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-27: Should check `nr_bytes == 0'
! indicatingthat GDB and the SIM have different ideas about
which registers are fetchable. */
if (sr_get_debug ())
{
--- 369,375 ----
internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
"Register size different to expected");
/* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-27: Should check `nr_bytes == 0'
! indicating that GDB and the SIM have different ideas about
which registers are fetchable. */
if (sr_get_debug ())
{