This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] ARM : prologue scan
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Jerome Guitton <guitton at act-europe dot fr>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:31:43 -0400
- Subject: Re: [RFA] ARM : prologue scan
- References: <20030721142742.GA3621@act-europe.fr>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 04:27:42PM +0200, Jerome Guitton wrote:
> This patch adds the interpretation of the missing "add" (resp. "sub")
> instruction. I have run the testsuite with the simulator, and I
> found no regression; but there was a lot of test that failed, so I have
> some suspicion on my setup. Can someone give me the average success/failure
> on this target, or (even better :-) test it on his own setup?
> Is the arm simulator (HEAD) reliable?
I was getting about fifty failures, mostly from a testsuite bug in
fileio.exp, IIRC.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer