This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Powerpc and software single step
>>>>> "AC" == Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> writes:
>> Ok, its probably my lingo shortcommings.
>> the ppc trees still use the olf MACROS:
>> SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP_P (the predicate?)
>> SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP (the function which is the gdbarch "vector")
AC> What about a patch to eliminate the macros? Good incremental step.
Agreed, but because the predicate tests the vector != NULL it is a
step away from the feature I need, which is to change the evaluation
of the preditcate at runtime.
AC> Once created, the architecture object doesn't change - it's describing
AC> the architecture and not the UI state.
Ok, I see that now. How about adding a predicate vector to gdbarch
being the "Good incremental step"?
AC> I suspect that both Daniel and I are (each in a round about way)
AC> suggesting that the code be modified to use a function containing all
AC> those tests.
Are you describing the function predicate, or an all singing all
dancing single-step function (as I suggested as well).
-JX