This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa] generate symbols associated to namespaces
- From: David Carlton <carlton at kealia dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: ezannoni at redhat dot com, Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>,Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 09:38:13 -0700
- Subject: Re: [rfa] generate symbols associated to namespaces
- References: <m3k7blg4dr.fsf@kealia.com><20030622173547.GA22603@nevyn.them.org><ro1brwntjhz.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU><20030624185019.GA24662@nevyn.them.org><yf28yrn1p8i.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com><yf2k7b7yyg5.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com><20030805175429.GA29704@nevyn.them.org><20030831192950.GA20616@nevyn.them.org>
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 15:29:50 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> said:
> This patch needs a trivial update for the gdb.c++ -> gdb.cp rename,
> and IIRC one other merge update for the testsuite; and the comments
> we discussed downthread. Mind reposting it?
I'll see if I can find time to do that, though I'm a bit busy right
now. But, frankly, I do mind reposting it (though I'm certainly not
blaming you for this): the patch has been awaiting symtab review for
two and a half months, and I shouldn't have to spend the time keeping
it up to date while waiting for the symtab maintainers to get around
to it.
I had a lot of time to work on GDB through the end of June; I have
much less time to work on GDB now. I'm still willing to spend the
time trying to get my branch merged into the mainline sources, but I'd
rather spend my limited GDB time doing things that are actually
productive (generating new patches, responding to criticism of them,
fixing bugs) instead of rehashing old patches.
David Carlton
carlton@kealia.com