This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: SH patch 2 (was Re: [RFA] SH: Deprecate deprecated functions, use new frame interface)


On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:44:05AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:32:54PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > What does that mean?  How does that affect the approval of my code
> > as it is now?
> 
> I can't answer the second question, but I can answer the first.
> 
> DW_OP_piece is not supported yet.  Kevin B. put together a nice little
> patch for a strictly limited case of DW_OP_piece triggered by the
> PowerPC e500 port; I don't know if this SH occurance is similar or a
> more general usage.
> 
> You may want to remove the bit which enables dwarf2 unwinding until
> this is fixed?  Just a thought.

I don't think that's necessary.  The results with dwarf2 unwinding are
1 FAIL less than without dwarf2 unwinding.  Removing the dwarf2
unwinding might result in forgetting it.  Keeping it in will remind us
that the dwarf2 unwinder still needs a bit of work.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Developer
Red Hat, Inc.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]