Re: SH patch 2 (was Re: [RFA] SH: Deprecate deprecated functions, use new frame interface)

[Corinna Vinschen <vinschen at redhat dot com>]

On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:26:15PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
>  > I don't think that's necessary.  The results with dwarf2 unwinding are
>  > 1 FAIL less than without dwarf2 unwinding.  Removing the dwarf2
>  > unwinding might result in forgetting it.  Keeping it in will remind us
>  > that the dwarf2 unwinder still needs a bit of work.
> 
> I think so too. But I'd like to see if something can be done for SH
> similar to the i386_convert_register_p method.

Is that necessary before the patch gets approval or could that be added
in a follow up step?

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Developer
Red Hat, Inc.