This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFA: Don't include value of expression in pc-fp.exp test name
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- To: jimb at redhat dot com
- Cc: ac131313 at redhat dot com, carlton at kealia dot com, fnasser at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:49:35 -0400
- Subject: Re: RFA: Don't include value of expression in pc-fp.exp test name
Yeah! It makes my life easier!
You need to add '2003' to the copyright year to the top of pc-fp.exp.
Proofread. Tested on my test bed with 10 configurations.
All the gdb.sum's come out identical now.
Can you wait a day or two for other people to offer an opinion?
Conditionally recommended for approval, conditions are:
. you fix the copyright year,
. nobody senior to me objects to this plan
Also, a good place to fish for this stuff is:
http://www.shout.net/~mec/sunday/current/Compare-by-binutils.html
About 95% of the "by binutils" differences are actually just
run-to-run differences, not really sensitive to binutils version.
Michael C
===
2003-09-30 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
* gdb.base/pc-fp.exp (get_valueofx): Don't include the value of
the expression in the pass message. This just creates spurious
differences in summary files.