This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: Don't include value of expression in pc-fp.exp test name


Yeah!  It makes my life easier!

You need to add '2003' to the copyright year to the top of pc-fp.exp.

Proofread.  Tested on my test bed with 10 configurations.
All the gdb.sum's come out identical now.

Can you wait a day or two for other people to offer an opinion?

Conditionally recommended for approval, conditions are:
  . you fix the copyright year,
  . nobody senior to me objects to this plan

Also, a good place to fish for this stuff is:

  http://www.shout.net/~mec/sunday/current/Compare-by-binutils.html

About 95% of the "by binutils" differences are actually just
run-to-run differences, not really sensitive to binutils version.

Michael C

===

2003-09-30  Jim Blandy  <jimb@redhat.com>

	* gdb.base/pc-fp.exp (get_valueofx): Don't include the value of
	the expression in the pass message.  This just creates spurious
	differences in summary files.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]