This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]


> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 10:08:48 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
> 
> From a user interface perspective, I got a really strong negative
> pushback the last time I tried to add a switch to any GDB command.

Any pointers to messages where such pushback could be seen?  I'm
curious what could be the motivation.

Another possibility would be to have 2 commands: "info breakpoints"
which only shows one breakpoint for each user breakpoint, and "info
all-breakpoints", which shows all of them.  We already have a
precedent for such an arrangement with "info registers" vs "info
all-registers".

Anyway, going to the maint-land is something I think we should avoid
in this case, as the breakpoints not shown by default are interesting
not only for GDB maintainers.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]