This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: mi/ChangeLog et.al.
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
- To: mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
- Cc: cagney at gnu dot org,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 06 Jan 2004 08:27:03 +0200
- Subject: Re: mi/ChangeLog et.al.
- References: <20040105211031.C07C74B35A@berman.michael-chastain.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:10:31 -0500 (EST)
> From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
>
> How about:
>
> gdb.mi/ChangeLog-1995
> gdb.mi/ChangeLog-1996
> gdb.mi/ChangeLog-1997
> gdb.mi/ChangeLog-1998
> gdb.mi/ChangeLog-1999
> gdb.mi/ChangeLog-2000
> gdb.mi/ChangeLog-2001
> gdb.mi/ChangeLog-2002
> gdb.mi/ChangeLog-2003
> testsuite/gdb.mi/ChangeLog-1999
> testsuite/gdb.mi/ChangeLog-2000
> testsuite/gdb.mi/ChangeLog-2001
> testsuite/gdb.mi/ChangeLog-2002
> testsuite/gdb.mi/ChangeLog-2003
I don't get it: gdb/mi/ and gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/ both have a single
ChangeLog file. Why would we want to create multiple files from them?
If all you want is to slightly change the name and put the years in
it, why not simply
gdb/mi/ChangeLog.1995-2003
gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/ChangeLog.1999-2003
?