This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Kevin Buettner (kevinb@redhat.com): > The rs6000 return value code will need to be revamped to not refer to > DEPRECATED_REGISTER_BYTE. And, in fact, it probably ought to be > restructured to use the mechanisms found in ppc-linux.c. See > ppc_linux_return_value() and ppc_sysv_abi_return_value(). This > is not a barrier to getting your current patch in; I only mention > it in case you wish to tackle this bit of work too. Sorry, I would not really easy for me, I do not have a convenient setup for PPC (that is actually the reason why it took me 3 days to be able to test against the testsuite :-) > > I have not yet tested it against the testsuite, I will do that > > tomorrow. In the meantime, if you have comments I would be happy to > > address them! > > Please let me know the results of your tests. If they look good, > please commit your patch. OK, thanks. Tested on the ppc-elf simulator, on a x86-linux host. No regression. I have slightly modified the patch, I do not see any reason to have a special case for doubles now. OK to apply with this change? -- Jerome
Attachment:
diff.3
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |