This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: handle missing fpregs

On 07 May 2004 16:05:11 -0500
Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com> wrote:

> > > +     /* On RS6000 variants that have no floating-point registers, the
> > > +        next two members will be -1.  */
> > 
> > I'm not comfortable with the term "RS6000 variants" here.  I'd be happier
> > with "PPC variants", though that's probably not strictly correct either.
> > I suppose you could just say "On cores that have no floating-point
> > registers...".
> 
> The issue is that people might not immediately see all PPC's as RS6000
> variants, right?  Fair enough.  "RS6000 variants" is historically
> correct, but it's not like anyone has fabricated an RS6000 in recent
> history.  I've changed that to "On PPC and RS6000 variants that ...".

Okay, that's fine.

Your revised patch is okay to commit.

Thanks!

Kevin
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]