This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch/rfa] configure check for curses library
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Randolph Chung <randolph at tausq dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 16 May 2004 08:04:52 +0200
- Subject: Re: [patch/rfa] configure check for curses library
- References: <20040515180123.GP566@tausq.org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 11:01:23 -0700
> From: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
>
> 2004-05-15 Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>
>
> * configure.in: Add a search for wattr_on to look for a curses
> library.
Does the TUI code in GDB actually use wattr_on or any symbols that
reference wattr_on? If not, we could defeat curses implementations
that don't have wattr_on, but are otherwise good enough for what GDB
needs.