This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [Commit] New file
- From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
- Cc: nickrob at gnu dot org, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 06:49:15 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Commit] New file
- References: <16563.42891.155614.609433@nick.uklinux.net> <6654-Wed26May2004124733+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <40B4C9A9.3040904@gnu.org> <6137-Thu27May2004102142+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <40B63FED.7080502@gnu.org> <6654-Fri28May2004105116+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <16567.38968.219077.271649@nick.uklinux.net> <40BB827F.5080906@gnu.org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 15:07:43 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
>
> Since this is largely an EMACS issue, can yourself, RMS, and Nick try to
> resolve this and come back with a recommendation?
I have no problems talking with Richard first, but it seems to me that
the issue is whether to have gdb-mi.el in GDB, which is something we,
as GDB maintainers, could decide on our own.
Am I missing something?