This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: PowerPC: add segment register numbers


How's this?

2004-07-12  Jim Blandy  <jimb@redhat.com>

	* ppc-tdep.h (struct gdbarch_tdep): New member: ppc_sr0_regnum.
	* rs6000-tdep.c (rs6000_gdbarch_init): Initialize it.

Index: gdb/ppc-tdep.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/ppc-tdep.h,v
retrieving revision 1.41
diff -c -p -r1.41 ppc-tdep.h
*** gdb/ppc-tdep.h	14 Jul 2004 23:18:09 -0000	1.41
--- gdb/ppc-tdep.h	14 Jul 2004 23:34:10 -0000
*************** struct gdbarch_tdep
*** 158,163 ****
--- 158,167 ----
      int ppc_fpscr_regnum;	/* Floating point status and condition
      				   register */
  
+     int ppc_sr0_regnum;         /* segment register 0, or -1 on
+                                    variants that have no segment
+                                    registers.  */
+ 
      int ppc_mq_regnum;		/* Multiply/Divide extension register */
      int ppc_vr0_regnum;		/* First AltiVec register */
      int ppc_vrsave_regnum;	/* Last AltiVec register */
Index: gdb/rs6000-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.217
diff -c -p -r1.217 rs6000-tdep.c
*** gdb/rs6000-tdep.c	14 Jul 2004 23:00:59 -0000	1.217
--- gdb/rs6000-tdep.c	14 Jul 2004 23:34:12 -0000
*************** rs6000_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info
*** 2879,2884 ****
--- 2879,2885 ----
      tdep->ppc_mq_regnum = -1;
    tdep->ppc_fp0_regnum = 32;
    tdep->ppc_fpscr_regnum = power ? 71 : 70;
+   tdep->ppc_sr0_regnum = 71;
    tdep->ppc_vr0_regnum = -1;
    tdep->ppc_vrsave_regnum = -1;
    tdep->ppc_ev0_regnum = -1;
*************** rs6000_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info
*** 2907,2913 ****
    else
      tdep->lr_frame_offset = 8;
  
!   if (v->arch == bfd_arch_powerpc)
      switch (v->mach)
        {
        case bfd_mach_ppc: 
--- 2908,2916 ----
    else
      tdep->lr_frame_offset = 8;
  
!   if (v->arch == bfd_arch_rs6000)
!     tdep->ppc_sr0_regnum = -1;
!   else if (v->arch == bfd_arch_powerpc)
      switch (v->mach)
        {
        case bfd_mach_ppc: 
*************** rs6000_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info
*** 2931,2936 ****
--- 2934,2940 ----
  	tdep->ppc_ev31_regnum = 38;
          tdep->ppc_fp0_regnum = -1;
          tdep->ppc_fpscr_regnum = -1;
+         tdep->ppc_sr0_regnum = -1;
          tdep->ppc_acc_regnum = 39;
          tdep->ppc_spefscr_regnum = 40;
          set_gdbarch_pc_regnum (gdbarch, 0);
*************** rs6000_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info
*** 2939,2945 ****
--- 2943,2963 ----
          set_gdbarch_pseudo_register_read (gdbarch, e500_pseudo_register_read);
          set_gdbarch_pseudo_register_write (gdbarch, e500_pseudo_register_write);
  	break;
+ 
+       case bfd_mach_ppc64:
+       case bfd_mach_ppc_620:
+       case bfd_mach_ppc_630:
+       case bfd_mach_ppc_a35:
+       case bfd_mach_ppc_rs64ii:
+       case bfd_mach_ppc_rs64iii:
+         /* These processor's register sets don't have segment registers.  */
+         tdep->ppc_sr0_regnum = -1;
+         break;
        }   
+   else
+     internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
+                     "rs6000_gdbarch_init: "
+                     "received unexpected BFD 'arch' value");
  
    /* Sanity check on registers.  */
    gdb_assert (strcmp (tdep->regs[tdep->ppc_gp0_regnum].name, "r0") == 0);


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]