This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 12:38:18 -0400 From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> Perhaps we should rename TM_FILE to something like TM_INCLUDE, then.
If you prefer, I can rename it to DEPRECATED_TM_INCLUDE when committing my pending deprecation patch.
If we change the functionality of TM_FILE (so it can now name any file), then it doesn't seem to be deprecated. Thus, DEPRECATED_TM_INCLUDE seems an inappropriate name to me.
I've now prototyped this change vis: TM_FILE -> TM_INCLUDE NAT_FILE -> NM_INCLUDE (for consistency) XM_FILE -> XM_INCLUDE and found that it didn't help.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |