This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:51:32AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Jason Molenda <jmolenda@apple.com> > > Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:09:08 -0700 > > > > Eli, I added a table documenting these values to stabs.texinfo. Do you > > think this is a correct use of a texinfo table? [...] > Therefore, if the indentation and the general formatting of @table is > okay with you, I think the following will look better: > > +@table @asis > +@item @code{N_SO_AS} (0x1) > +Assembly language > > etc., you get the point. Thanks for the feedback, Eli. Attached is an updated patch to the documentation. The FSF has just accepted the generation of this code, the original patch posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-08/msg00917.html And approved here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg01572.html So I'd like to get the documentation checked in to gdb, at least. Can you approve this? The patch goes through makeinfo and texi2html without any warnings; the generated HTML looks fine. Thanks. Jason (sending from my molenda.com acct instead of apple.com because of irrelevant/uninteresting technical difficulties.) 2004-09-20 Jason Molenda (jason-cl@molenda.com) * stabs.texinfo (Paths and Names of the Source Files): Document the meaning of values in the 'desc' field of a SO stab.
Attachment:
pa.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |