This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Change gdbarch_return_value to take function type instead of return value type


> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:49:16 +0200
> From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
> 
> @Eli: I've also changed the gdbarch_return_value documentation in
>       gdbint.texinfo.  I'm not quite sure if the @code brackets are
>       correct here.  Can you advice?

The use of @code with gdbarch_return_value is correct (every
programming language symbol should be in @code).  However, this:

  +This is usually done by calling @code{struct type *return_type = check_typedef (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (functype));}

should use @example, like this:

  This is usually done by calling
  @smallexample
  struct type *return_type = check_typedef (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (functype));
  @endsmallexample

Otherwise, fine; thanks.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]