This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] New test for set backtrace related functionality

From: Michael Chastain <mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com>
To: pgilliam at us dot ibm dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:59:22 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch] New test for set backtrace related functionality
References: <200410141539.22560.pgilliam@us.ibm.com><200410141544.39722.pgilliam@us.ibm.com><200410210955.15904.pgilliam@us.ibm.com>

Paul Gilliam <pgilliam@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> one week ping.

Argh, sorry about that.

Some of the lines in setbacktrace.exp are incorrectly formatted
(weird line wrapping after the '+' markers have been inserted).
you send me a clean copy of the files, by sending them as attachments
perhaps?

Meanwhile I will clean up what I've got and give it a review.

Michael

===

2004-10-14  Paul Gilliam  <pgilliam@us.ibm.com>

	* gdb.base/setbacktrace.c gdb.base/setbacktrace.exp: New files.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] New test for set backtrace related functionality
  - From: Paul Gilliam

References:
- [patch] New test for set backtrace related functionality
  - From: Paul Gilliam
- Re: [patch] New test for set backtrace related functionality
  - From: Paul Gilliam
- Re: [patch] New test for set backtrace related functionality
  - From: Paul Gilliam

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]