On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 11:52:25AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
I don't want to add target_get_lwp only to remove it a couple weeks
later! I don't think this patch is appropriate for 6.3; for the
mainline, we have plenty of time, so please wait a little longer.
You're correct, it definitly isn't appropriate for 6.3. However, it is
appropriate for mainline. Lets get this patch off the table (and have
working watchpoints), that way we're in a position to better focus on
just the refactorings you talk of. Especially since, this work gives us
a working test case that we can refactor against.
Sound reasonable?
Andrew, I'm confused. Aren't you the maintainer who is historically
most likely to jump on contributors for kludging around missing
infrastructure? I think we should solve this correctly, not with (so
far) two majorly incorrect hacks.
And we've already got working watchpoints. This is for multi-threaded
hardware watchpoints, which have never worked right in GDB and thus
seem to me like a new feature.