This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [commit] Tighten memory read/write methods

From: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, Mark Kettenis <kettenis at gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:48:14 -0500
Subject: Re: [commit] Tighten memory read/write methods
References: <41F94AE7.4020405@gnu.org> <200501272103.j0RL3TWS001805@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <41F973EA.6030305@gnu.org> <200501280845.j0S8jkZx000823@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <01c5052e$Blat.v2.4$2b4f9f00@zahav.net.il>

Eli,

Like I said to Mark:

We can certainly debate the merits of ISO vs BFD and bfd_byte vs void [vs gdb_byte], however lets keep that debate separate to my current task - getting constants sufficiently propogated for me to do my next value.h commit which in turn finishes DW_OP_piece.

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [commit] Tighten memory read/write methods
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [commit] Tighten memory read/write methods
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

References:
- [commit] Tighten memory read/write methods
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [commit] Tighten memory read/write methods
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [commit] Tighten memory read/write methods
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [commit] Tighten memory read/write methods
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [commit] Tighten memory read/write methods
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]