This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] seperate HP aCC compiler_info into Major, Minor, and Extension
- From: Paul Gilliam <pgilliam at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:34:14 -0800
- Subject: Re: [patch] seperate HP aCC compiler_info into Major, Minor, and Extension
- References: <200504081521.07587.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <20050414191631.GF26377@nevyn.them.org>
- Reply-to: pgilliam at us dot ibm dot com
On Thursday 14 April 2005 12:16, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:21:07PM -0800, Paul Gilliam wrote:
> > This patch seperates the compiler info string for the HP aCC compiler into it's components.
> > The old value for version A.01.21 was hpacc-010121; the new value would be hpacc-01-01-21.
> > This is consistant with the why GCC is handled.
> >
> > -=# Paul #=-
> >
> > ---
> > 2005-04-08 Paul Gilliam <pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
> >
> > * lib/compiler.c: Divide HP aCC 'compiler_info' into components.
> > * lib/compiler.cc: Likewise.
>
> Not OK I'm afraid. I tried an aCC installation I had handy:
>
> bash-2.05b$ aCC --version
> aCC: HP ANSI C++ B3910B A.03.45
>
> set compiler_info [join {hpacc 34500 } -]
>
> That's not going to match your regexp.
>
From the doc I read on the net somewhere, that version info
should be translated into 'hpacc 010345'.
And we all know, the net nevers is wrong. 8-(
should it be changed to:
set need_a_set [eval {regexp {1(..)(..)(..)} [expr __HP_aCC + 1000000] dontcare nn xx mm;set compiler_info "hpacc-$mm-$nn-$xx"}]
or to:
set need_a_set [eval {regexp {1(..)(..)(..)..} [expr __HP_aCC + 100000000] dontcare mm nn xx;set compiler_info "hpacc-$mm-$nn-$xx"}]
or just forget the whole thing? Maybe this is more futzing around than it's worth.
(But I do like it when things are consistant.)
-=# Paul #=-