This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Readline on MinGW

From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: bug-readline at gnu dot org, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:58:28 +0300
Subject: Re: PATCH: Readline on MinGW
References: <4270886B.1020806@codesourcery.com> <01c54c2d$Blat.v2.4$f3029840@zahav.net.il> <20050428201215.GA14846@nevyn.them.org> <42714B6F.1030009@codesourcery.com>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:45:35 -0700
> From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
> CC: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  bug-readline@gnu.org, 
>  gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> Eli, just to be clear, you said you "support" the patches I posted (with 
> this exception).  I'm interpreting that as "I hope they go into upstream 
> readline", rather than as "it's OK to check these patches into the GDB 
> repository."

Yes, I was suggesting that Readline maintainers include your changes
in the upstream code base.

References:
- PATCH: Readline on MinGW
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: PATCH: Readline on MinGW
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: PATCH: Readline on MinGW
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: PATCH: Readline on MinGW
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]