This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch ping] MIPS32 / MIPS64 release 2 support in simulator
- From: David Ung <davidu at mips dot com>
- To: cgd at broadcom dot com
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 11:33:40 +0100
- Subject: Re: [patch ping] MIPS32 / MIPS64 release 2 support in simulator
- References: <1099495559.2778.53.camel@stockwell.mips.com> <mailpost.1099495587.2562@news-sj1-1> <yov5zn1yzx90.fsf@ldt-sj3-010.sj.broadcom.com> <mailpost.1099501062.5136@news-sj1-1> <yov5d5yuojo4.fsf@xl-sj1-01.sj.broadcom.com> <1099576389.2778.90.camel@stockwell.mips.com> <mailpost.1099576418.9773@news-sj1-1> <yov51xf98q2l.fsf@xl-sj1-03.sj.broadcom.com> <418FA243.4060507@gnu.org> <1099937194.2780.151.camel@stockwell.mips.com> <4190EC00.6070501@gnu.org> <yov5vfcff0v6.fsf@xl-sj1-04.sj.broadcom.com> <4190F770.70006@gnu.org> <yov5actqrkih.fsf@xl-sj1-04.sj.broadcom.com> <1101316048.29221.240.camel@stockwell.mips.com> <yov5brdnt8mw.fsf@xl-sj1-01.sj.broadcom.com> <1116433763.1623.257.camel@localhost.localdomain> <yov5k6lwmfjs.fsf@xl-sj1-03.sj.broadcom.com> <mailpost.1116450142.2303@news-sj1-1> <yov5sm0cwbtz.fsf@xl-sj1-03.sj.broadcom.com> <yov5ll61oens.fsf@xl-sj1-03.sj.broadcom.com>
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 14:33 -0700, cgd@broadcom.com wrote:
> At 24 May 2005 14:31:04 -0700, Chris G. Demetriou wrote:
> > just so you know i haven't forgotten: I'm trying to do do a basic
> > build + sanity check of these changes Right Now.
>
> I've just checked them in.
thanks.
> I reformatted your changelog a bit to be more like the normal GNU
> style. (I figured it'd be really, really poor form to ask you to do
> that. 8-)
The less change I have to make, the better it is for me.. ;)
> i tested them by finding a version of gcc which would builds
> mipsisa64-elf, and checking before and after. I.e., i checked to see
> that the MIPS64 code wasn't broken, but didn't check the
> MIPS32r4/MIPS64r2 code.
>
> I figure you'll be doing that regularly.
yes. We ran mips32r2 checks regularly but not mips64r2. We do check
mips64 though.
David.