This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: mi tty commands
- From: Bob Rossi <bob at brasko dot net>
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 16:43:30 -0400
- Subject: Re: mi tty commands
- References: <20050302025219.GA29948@white> <20050311022644.GA15563@white> <20050522210040.GB9231@white> <20050528230855.GE22435@nevyn.them.org> <uzmue8qsk.fsf@gnu.org> <20050529205435.GA11243@white> <20050601001440.GB15414@white> <uk6leafql.fsf@gnu.org> <20050601130653.GA17103@white> <u3bs1degj.fsf@gnu.org>
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 11:11:56PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:06:53 -0400
> > From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
> > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> >
> > > Which reminds me: now that you introduced "set tty", doesn't that mean
> > > we should remove the "tty" command as redundant?
> >
> > I don't think so. Simply because the tty command has been around for
> > ages and FE's depend on it being there. Removing the tty command would
> > successfully break every front end.
>
> Not if we leave "tty" as an alias for "set tty". Any objections to do
> that as part of your patch?
Yeah, if that leaves the user the 'tty /dev/pts/1' interface, than it's
fine with me. I'd be happy to add it to this patch, I just haven't used
an alias before and will have to look into it.
Thanks,
Bob Rossi