This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> We have a number of other projects listed there that aren't part of > our source trees (like "hello" or "textutils"). Why can't expect > and dejagnu have the same status? Is there any harm in leaving them > in? You never know when some third party (Red Hat Inc comes to > mind) will want to build everything in one tree themselves. This is the objection I was anticipating and, if that's considered to be the case, then that's fine. Patch withdrawn. :-) Ben
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |