On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 10:30:12AM -0400, Kris Warkentin wrote:
> We're throwing named thread support into the kernel so I'm keeping an
> arbitrary length string in there. Would never be a huge memory leak
but
> I'm fussy that way.
You don't actually need this to add an arbitrary lenth string; the
target gets to malloc this, you can use a trailing char[1] or simply
malloc sizeof(struct) + strlen (char) + 1 and point the char* right
after the struct.
If it's clearer to do it this way, though, we can go with your patch.
If you'd rather do that let me know; IIRC there were some formatting
glitches.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC