This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: $argc variable
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Andrew STUBBS <andrew dot stubbs at st dot com>
- Cc: drow at false dot org, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 06:10:32 +0200
- Subject: Re: $argc variable
- References: <436A0BD2.5080505@st.com> <20051107001800.GF19200@nevyn.them.org> <436F35E9.4070808@st.com> <20051107133538.GA2331@nevyn.them.org> <43709E94.4070004@st.com> <u7jbisp6n.fsf@gnu.org> <4371D9A6.40109@st.com> <u3bm5sk6i.fsf@gnu.org> <43731C16.2040203@st.com> <20051113173524.GC1945@nevyn.them.org> <4378BB1A.9070606@st.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:28:10 +0000
> From: Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > It looks OK to me. Could you post the revised documentation (to
> > gdb-patches, please) so that we can make sure that Eli and you did
> > converge? I couldn't quite follow your earlier conversation.
>
> Here is the full patch including both code and docs.
>
> In the end I have dropped the index altogether. Eli didn't like the
> kindex and the cindex would be so close to the cindex for the section,
> and so similar in content, that it would be pointless.
>
> I still think there is an argument for a kindex entry for both $argc and
> $arg0...$arg1 in case people don't know they are looking for
> 'user-defined', but I'm not really that bothered.
>
> OK?
OK for the documentation patch.