This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rfa/doc] Add section on interrupts to remote protocol documentation


Jim Blandy wrote:

On 11/18/05, Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> wrote:


+@samp{Ctrl-C}, on the other hand, is defined and implemented for all
+transport mechanisms. It is represented by sending the single byte
+@code{0x03} without any of the usual packet overhead described in in
+the Overview section (@pxref{Overview}). When a @code{0x03} byte is
+transmitted as part of a packet, it is considered to be packet data
+and does @emph{not} represent an interrupt. E.g., an @samp{X} packet
+(@pxref{X packet}, used for binary downloads, may include an unescaped
+@code{0x03} as part of its packet.



Yep, that's pretty explicit. Fine with me.





Ditto.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]