Re: [commit] spelling errors in rs6000-tdep.c

[Jim Blandy <jimb at red-bean dot com>]

At the risk of bike-shedding...

The fact that "nonexistent" is in regular use doesn't mean that
"existent" is entirely kosher:
http://www.ling.upenn.edu/courses/ling001/mccord.html

In the 'sz' fields, I think "nonexistent" is right: it's zero when the
registers don't exist.

But in rs6000_gdbarch_init, "extant" is a much better word, having the
connotations of "already".

I've committed the attached.

gdb/ChangeLog:
2005-12-20  Jim Blandy  <jimb@redhat.com>

	* rs6000-tdep.c (rs6000_gdbarch_init): Doc fix.

Index: gdb/rs6000-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.251
diff -c -p -r1.251 rs6000-tdep.c
*** gdb/rs6000-tdep.c	20 Dec 2005 17:57:44 -0000	1.251
--- gdb/rs6000-tdep.c	20 Dec 2005 19:32:44 -0000
*************** rs6000_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info
*** 3120,3126 ****
  	wordsize = 4;
      }
  
!   /* Find a candidate among existent architectures.  */
    for (arches = gdbarch_list_lookup_by_info (arches, &info);
         arches != NULL;
         arches = gdbarch_list_lookup_by_info (arches->next, &info))
--- 3120,3126 ----
  	wordsize = 4;
      }
  
!   /* Find a candidate among extant architectures.  */
    for (arches = gdbarch_list_lookup_by_info (arches, &info);
         arches != NULL;
         arches = gdbarch_list_lookup_by_info (arches->next, &info))