This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [commit] spelling errors in rs6000-tdep.c
At the risk of bike-shedding...
The fact that "nonexistent" is in regular use doesn't mean that
"existent" is entirely kosher:
http://www.ling.upenn.edu/courses/ling001/mccord.html
In the 'sz' fields, I think "nonexistent" is right: it's zero when the
registers don't exist.
But in rs6000_gdbarch_init, "extant" is a much better word, having the
connotations of "already".
I've committed the attached.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2005-12-20 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
* rs6000-tdep.c (rs6000_gdbarch_init): Doc fix.
Index: gdb/rs6000-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.251
diff -c -p -r1.251 rs6000-tdep.c
*** gdb/rs6000-tdep.c 20 Dec 2005 17:57:44 -0000 1.251
--- gdb/rs6000-tdep.c 20 Dec 2005 19:32:44 -0000
*************** rs6000_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info
*** 3120,3126 ****
wordsize = 4;
}
! /* Find a candidate among existent architectures. */
for (arches = gdbarch_list_lookup_by_info (arches, &info);
arches != NULL;
arches = gdbarch_list_lookup_by_info (arches->next, &info))
--- 3120,3126 ----
wordsize = 4;
}
! /* Find a candidate among extant architectures. */
for (arches = gdbarch_list_lookup_by_info (arches, &info);
arches != NULL;
arches = gdbarch_list_lookup_by_info (arches->next, &info))