This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Linux Checkpoints, take 3
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl
- Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 11:13:32 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Linux Checkpoints, take 3
- References: <43AC7D2E.6020609@redhat.com> <u4q4yj4ul.fsf@gnu.org>
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 10:07:14AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > ! /* Detach new forked process? */
> > ! if (detach_fork)
> > {
> > ! if (debug_linux_nat)
> > ! {
> > ! target_terminal_ours ();
> > ! fprintf_filtered (gdb_stdlog,
> > ! "Detaching after fork from child process %d.\n",
> > ! child_pid);
> > ! }
>
> Might as well mark strings with _(), as long as we are changing the
> code.
We've discussed this before, but I don't remember the conclusion - is
there benefit to translating debug messages not intended for users?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC